I have long considered the vast majority of alleged ‘terrorist attacks’ the work of our very own overseers. They come to validate crack-downs on civil liberty and more importantly, they come to justify more devilry in foreign realms.
Pondering the situation logically and plainly…We have assaulted, maimed and mangled a stable Iraq, we have destroyed a prosperous Libya, we have engineered chaos and the rise of neo-nazis in Ukraine, we have created and supported and protected ISIS, we have nodded in agreement towards, supplied the weapons and media black-out of the horrific war in Yemen…And people wonder why there is retaliation.
It appears to me in the least, counter productive, to continually destroy muslim states, when there are millions of muslims in our own states. What are they to do, when religion trumps their adopted culture? This is one aspect of the story I am tentatively dipping my virtual focus within.
I would suggest that the extreme elements of Islam, would be eager to strike back. Not just in their homelands of the Middle EAST, but their homelands of England, and France and wherever else they have been born and bred. Now does this, do I, suggest that religion trumps culture and society and the norms and values found therein? To some degree, the answer is YES. By which I mean, such people will rant, even fight for their religious views.
However, there is a massive step, presently unexplained, between feeling angered and horrified and proud, and embarking upon an endeavour which spells CERTAIN DEATH. Nice, Paris, London, Sydney? The narrative is always the same. Either a loner who can be shown to have some connexions to some crowd or website of extremist leaning, or ‘they were on our radar, but not deemed a threat’. Now the latter feels loosely viable, the former not at all. How can anyone with a family, with any enjoyment of life, any love in their lives, regardless of religion, move even from charges of public disorder to embracing CERTAIN DEMISE? Without a major push…
There is something missing in all these so called ‘terrorist attacks’. Namely, what happened in between religious nutjob, with no form for committing major carnage, at best, a few battles on the streets, to encourage them towards their CERTAIN DEMISE?
There is a major factor in this jump, from dickhead, nasty cunt loner to kamikaze, we are missing and is never mentioned in the mainstream media. Drugs may play a part, as must a more advanced than we can perceive or believe in routine of Mind Control. Yet when I constantly collide with people who remark that Putin is a threat to the ‘free world’ I should accept more readily that most humans are brainwashed morons…already very much directed well beyond and removed from any semblance of capacity for critical thinking. This is mind control, at large. The finger is pointed and we all follow and shout ‘he is the bad guy! Lets get him!’.
The question to ask, with any major story, is Cui Bono? Who Gains? I have grown tired of demanding others pose this question towards their own lemming regurgitation of the main stream media message found on ALL their screens, let alone the front pages of the ‘newspapers’/.
One of the earliest recorded notes in the annals of history of what we know now today as ‘terrorists’ springs to mind. Ponder that I am speaking of the 10th or 11th century…Hasan-i-sabah, once forging through no bloodshed – to give him due honour, but cunning – command of the fortress of Mount Alamut in Persia, initiated devotees into total obedience to his power through drugging them with Hashish, so heavily so, that when they awakened, they would find beautiful maidens, wine, paradise, and to seek to continue to enjoy such a heaven or Shangri-la on earth or elsewhere, they need only show total obedience to his command…
His recruits, devotees, were so renowned for their unwavering devotion to his cause that for years they could be deeply embedded as sleeper cells, then strike at the throat. His cult were know as Hashshashin or Assassins…
And so, close to a 1000 years ago…some humans, yes they were islamic, were plied with drugs, given a taste of what any man would consider paradise, then directed to kill, maybe a day from now, maybe a year from now, the point is, they were drugged and brainwashed, to commit atrocities, in exchange for entrance to a paradise they had touched. This was 1000 years ago. Ponder that.
We have advanced hugely and dangerously in drugs and mind control. And taking into account the story of Hasan-i-Sabah, I cannot help but find the logical explanation for people embracing any path which leads to CERTAIN DEATH, solely because they have been given a taste or hope of a paradise found in death. For even for the most unhappy of people, the most deranged, the most disenfranchised, to decide upon a course of seeking CERTAIN DEMISE through killing innocent people when you know full well that people with guns will be in close attendance to end you…needs more explanation than we are given.
Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were proven to be coke fiends, regularly enjoying the services of high and low class hookers. Far removed from religious extremists…
I should and will focus on the published stories of all those involved in ‘terrorist’ attacks, in the near future…Yet for now. I ask you to ponder my own conclusion focused upon the pre-cursor to Now of Hasan-i-sabah’s methods….If you believe we have evolved, improved, advanced, then Hasan’s hugely successful techniques have evolved, improved, advanced in turn.
Recent Comments