PUTIN DID IT!
Just like the Skripal saga, the same platforms all connected to the corporate elite and intelligence agencies in the West are megaphone repeating the condemnation of
PUTIN DID IT!
Also the same is the complete absence of :
motive
evidence
By the way, where are the Skripals? Those poor souls Putin allegedly tried to have killed 2 years back? With the ‘most toxic nerve agent ever created’ that seems rather ineffective!
They remain likely either dead or in UK custody. Its probably the former by logical analysis, for the more plausible narrative than the ridiculous routine the UK government and mass media published is that Yulia was en-route to help her father get back to Russia. Possibly something to do with the Steele dossier. Or some other UK sensitive information he was privy to.
Whatever Sergey was aware of, possibly wanting to get out of the UK out of fear of the UK security forces, he was not allowed to tell. So great the need to silence him that they took his daughter out as well! The plan to get him out of the UK ties in more logically with the GRU agents at least somehow in the same city (yet pictured nowhere near Skripals or Sergey’s house – whilst on CCTV for almost the entirety of their field trip). An extraction routine perhaps which the UK intelligence agencies intercepted? or which was inspired/triggered by Russian forces intercepting plans to hide/silence Sergey?
Add to this that it was the year of election for Putin and Russia were to host the World Cup – what possible motive makes it seem a great idea to poison a father and child for the world to see and sign the bodies as ‘RUSSIA DID IT!’.???
As for poor Yulia, the one ‘public’ appearance in a garden in england, after the poisoning showed her healthy, lucid…and also expressing something off the script that she had been given, by saying she wanted to go home, as in to Russia. Curious eh? Julia was evidently under the assumption that –
it was not the russian state who poisoned her.
She was not safe where she was
All of this is more reasonable that the version most assume which was repeated a million times by the usual crowd of corporate and compromised ‘media platforms’ precisely because these conclusions are the most simple.
Guardian, BBC, Bus Insider, CNN, Fox, WashPo, Snopes, Bellingcat, ABC, RFE…the usual crowd who make up the major megaphones of the western propaganda machine.
‘highly likely’ with zero proof, is not proven guilty.
As with the UK government before, the Germans refuse to share their ‘novichok’ sample with the russians.
How dare the russian government expect to see the evidence against them! What a ridiculous idea! Because that isn’t how justice works in the West! No thank you, we don’t need to show the accused the evidence upon which they will be convicted, it must always be enough for the prosecution to simply say-
‘they did it! we are sure! no evidence but we have it. Some confidential person, told us of something that emerged, and that its highly likely, so there, sorry, cannot show them to you or name them, but trust us…they did it!’
case closed.
It is an amazing insight into the herded lemming mentality of most westerners that they believe such tripe and have seemingly no capacity for critical thinking.
Navalny is a pipsqueak in Russia, at least politically speaking.
He has no growing support, offers no threat to Putin or the Russian state higher-ups.
He is also married to a KGB family with some curious connections in London, now very much entrenched in the upper echelons of british high society.
Navalny is also when it suits a jolly far right nationalist, and has been on the payroll of guess who eh??? The CIA!
Among NED projects in Russia has been to finance Russian anti-Putin opposition activist Alexei Navalny, member of a group called Russian Opposition Coordination Council. Navalny received money from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
The NED has sub-units: National Republican Institute, which is headed by Senator John McCain, the man who played a key role in the 2014 USA coup d’etat in Ukraine. The National Democratic Institute, tied to USA Democratic Party and chaired now by Clinton Secretary of State and Serbian bombing advocate, Madeline Albright. The NED Board of Directors includes the kernel of the Bush-Cheney neo-conservative warhawks like Elliott Abrams; Francis Fukuyama; Zalmay Khalilzad, former Iraq and Afghan US ambassador, and architect of Afghan war; Robert Zoellick, Bush family insider and ex-World Bank President.
Among projects in Russia the NED financed in 2014 according to their abridged annual report was $530,067 under a category, Transparency in Russia: “To raise awareness of corruption.” Are they working with Russian prosecutors or police? How do they find the corruption they raise awareness of? That naturally also has a side benefit of giving Washington intimate details of corruption, real or imagined, that can be later used by its trained activist NGOs such as Navalny groups. Another project under their NED heading, Democratic Ideas and Values: $400,000 for something called “Meeting Point of Human Rights and History–To raise awareness of the use and misuse of historical memory, and to stimulate public discussion of pressing social and political issues.” It sounds suspiciously like the State Department’s recent campaign to rewrite the history of the Second World War and the fact that Russia and her affiliated Soviet regions lost 27 million lives in bearing the brunt of the victory over Hitler.
Another curious thing about Navalny, not sure where this goes other than some probably far-fetched pondering of connections as an asset of the Russian state…he has been arrested many times, even arrested when on some kind of probation (which usually 100% leads to prison), and yet every single time, he is in custody just long enough to arrange his release…
Navalny is also not quite the do-gooder darling the western propaganda machine would have you generally assume>
What is reported less often about Navalny are his nationalist leanings, ties to neo-Nazi groups, xenophobic comments and extreme anti-immigrant views. References to Navalny’s nationalism in the West are usually buried or brushed off, while the headlines sing his praises.
Many Navalny supporters are extremely anti-immigrant, particularly when it comes to newcomers from the Caucasus and Central Asia. Many see Putin as playing a part in the destruction of the traditional fabric of Russia. Navalny himself has played a role in skinhead marches in Moscow and earned the sympathies of extremists. In other words, if he were an American, liberals would hate Navalny far more than they hate Trump or Steve Bannon — and yet he is glorified and exalted as Russia’s last, best hope.
In a bizarre video, Navalny appeared to compare people from the Caucasus to “cockroaches” that need to be exterminated. While cockroaches can be killed with a slipper, he says, for humans he “recommends a pistol.” Navalny supporters claim it’s all just a joke.
Dictator vs. democrat? Not quite: Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny is no progressive hero
The idea that Putin had Navalny poisoned, then ensured that doctors worked for 44 hours to save him, then allow him to be transferred to Berlin…makes no sense.
Navalny is known for his connections to the US government and media. The only outcome would be mega condemnation, and more sanctions. And it takes a true fool to assume Putin is that dumb or maybe some kinda sleeper cell secretly out to destroy Russia?
Also, the russian ambassador has been asking the germans for proof. They refuse to give this proof.
Oddly enough with the allegations of the Skripal poisoning, the Uk government refused to give the russians proof. And yet…some of their deceptions with other nations came out to reveal their duplicity.
Austria officially confirmed this week that the British Government’s allegation that Novichok, a Russian chemical warfare agent, was used in England by GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, in March 2018, was a British invention.
Add to this the steadfast refusal to share the sample with Russia, and the OPCW swiss lab – one of five who investigated the sample given to them by the UK>
-
The full text is classified and has been made available only to “state parties.” The summary is extremely vague. The OPCW does not mention Russia. Nor does it use the term novichok …
The only time the OPCW uses the term “nerve agent” it is prefaced with the caveat “allegedly.” The description throughout is of a “toxic chemical” being deployed on March 4 against the Skripals. The OPCW does not name the chemical, nor does it identify its origins. On both counts, this fails to substantiate the claims that were at the centre of the British government’s misinformation.
All the OPCW summary does is “confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity [not the origins] of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people.”
Oddly, the OPCW states that the toxic chemical involved was of “high purity” with an “almost complete absence” of any impurities. … … and highly diluted.. even if those properties directly contradict each other. (10)
-
“The experts of the Institute discovered traces of toxic chemical called ‘BZ’and its precursors. It is a Schedule 2 substance under the Chemical Weapons Convention.” “BZ” is a chemical agent, used to temporary [sic] incapacitate people due to its psychotoxic effect which is reached in 30-60 minutes after the agent’s application and lasts up to four days. “According to the information the Russian Federation possesses, this agent was used in the armed forces of the USA, United Kingdom and several others NATO member states. No stocks of such substance ever existed either in the Soviet Union or in the Russian Federation,” the officer pointed out.
-
the Swiss experts also “discovered strong concentration of traces of the nerve agent of A-234 type in its initial states as well as its decomposition products.” “In view of the experts, such concentration of the A-234 agent would result in inevitable fatal outcome of its administration.
-
Moreover, considering its high volatility,the detection of this substance in its initial state (pure form and high concentration) is extremely suspicious as the samples have been taken several weeks since the poisoning,” [emphases added by KB] (11)
So what we actually know, from the OPCW is that –
- no Novichok was found.
- Russia was not in any way confirmed as the origin.
- The purity of the sample given by the UK was suspicious as it was very pure, even weeks after the alleged attack.
- The purity of the sample provided would have certainly led to death of anyone infected.
Next, we have two publicly available appearances of Yulia Skripal.
One in which she says by phone to her cousin in Russia>
“[e]verything is fine, everything is solvable, everyone is recovering and everyone is alive.”
When the cousin told her she planned to visit London to see her soon, Yulia replied,
“They are not going to give you a visa, Vik.”
Yulia said that her father was “resting now, sleeping,” and “slightly choked up”, she added that
“everyone’s health is normal and there are no irreversible things.”
Not long after we found the only physical appearance of Yulia, in a staged, scripted garden scene, where she was clearly reading from a dialogue written in front of her.
She was very clear in stating that she wanted to go home to Russia.
The most simple conclusion of this is that whatever she had been told, Yulia had no suspicion of the Russian State behind the alleged attack…else why the hell would she want to return there?
I won’t go into the complete absence of evidence of the perfume bottle, of the insane claims of GRU agents handling enough mega poison to kill 1m people! Or their fraternising with local street walkers or steady coverage by CCTV and zero tying in with the Skripals.
Nor will I bother going into detail of Porton Down Uk chemical weapons lab just down the road from the Skripals incident.
Just stick with the most simple conclusions –
- The british government poisoned the skripals.
- Sergie must have known something and perhaps was organising a return to Russia.
- They have been given new identities, remain in US/Uk custody or have been killed.
- The british government lied about the Novichok, lied about the confirmation of any connection to the Russian State alleged chemical weapons, lied about the perfume bottle, lied about the whole saga.
So…back to Navalny.
Again, let’s go with the most simple solutions, I know some haughty types love to reference Occams Razor, and why not eh?
- No proof of any russian state poisoning so, there was no russian state poisoning.
- Russian state saved his life and put him on a plane to Berlin as they had no knowledge of any poisoning nor wanted him dead.
- Germany is under mega pressure/economic threat from the US due to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
- german government has been responding with warmongering talk towards Russia, no doubt agitated by the US e.g. German Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbaue of late told the media The “Putin system” is an “aggressive regime, which seeks without scruples to enforce its interests by violent means and repeatedly violates the international norms of behaviour,” she said. The poisoning of Alexei Navalny, she asserted, is proof that in Russia outlawed chemical weapons are used against people. The Putin regime is thus “on the same level as regimes, such as that in Syria, which have used chemical weapons against their own civilian population.” – no proof of any of this, but fighting talk! …Look at also Der Speigal’s conclusion from Sep 3- ‘“The time for toughness is now. Now is the time to hurt the man in the Kremlin.” –Very dangerous talk really on the basis of zero evidence, but the germans have form for this>>>
- german intelligence (BND) was the same crowd who helped ‘prove’ that Saddam had WMD that led to justifying the destruction of Iraq (peek elsewhere for ‘Curveball’…the saga of the iraqi engineer and BND. There were no WMD so they have form for working with US intelligence to fabricate evidence which leads to the deaths of thousands and millions of lives ruined.
- The major crowd with motive to use Navalny as a prop in further demonisation of Russian state is the US/UK – so this is a US/UK state action.
- Navalny is no threat to Putin, so would not have been treated as a threat by Putin.
- During this time of COVID, regular flights are not ongoing between Germany and Russia. They need special authorisation at high levels of state apparatus. The most simple answer as to why the Russian state facilitated the plane trip for a German plane to come into Russia to collect Navalny and fly him to Berlin is that the Russian state were making effort to help Navalny. It extremely unlikely, 100% nonsensical for the Russian state to have poisoned this man, then allowed him to be saved in Russia, then arranged his travel to Germany where any toxic agent would be found and helped him fly there…
- The Russian hospital staff who treated Navalny had stabilised his condition. And yet since been moved to germany his condition has worsened and he now fights for his life (apparently). All requests for proof of this condition, for data, for samples has been denied to the russian state and health services. When someone says something that seems highly suspicious and has no proof, the simplest answer is that they are lying. When they point blank refuse to supply any proof whilst telling the world you have committed a mega crime that must be punished, the simplest conclusion is a set-up.
- CUi Bono? Who gains? The US and Uk gain in their justification for further sanctions against Russia, further military threat alongside economic, information warfare alongside possibly achieving their mega goal of ending the Nord Stream2 pipeline just when it is close to finished and forcing Germany to buy LPG from KSA and the US, instead of trillions of $$ worth from Russia. Navalny gains more exposure for the cherry picked parts of his manufactured reputation by the West…And Russia gain ZERO. Simplest answer is the US/Uk are behind this. Those with the most to gain are usually the responsible party.
Recent Comments